Tag

Justin Bieber

Browsing

During the past few weeks, it feels like society has taken a huge step back in the way we perceive/treat/look at women. As a culture, we are obsessed with beauty and celebrity but mostly surrounding women. How women are portrayed in media? It’s getting old. Seriously.

Women objectified, depicted as sex objects, prancing around topless. Men around them, fully clothed. First it was the explicit video of this stupid song:

Then Justin Timberlake hit a new low with his video:

 

And yesterday this post just floored me:

public shaming

There is too much to talk about here, from the issue of objectifying women to people’s crazy and unrealistic perception of beauty and society’s obsession with physical appearance.

In media and advertising, women are projected as sex symbols, or like the recent music videos, merchandise. Sex sells – the more explicit, the better.

While Robin Thicke’s explicit “Blurred Lines” video got booted off YouTube, Justin Timberlake’s Tunnel Vision” didn’t get censored. YouTube said, “While our Guidelines generally prohibit nudity, we make exceptions when it is presented in an educational, documentary or artistic context, and take care to add appropriate warnings and age-restrictions.”

When is the line crossed between “artistic” and “sexual” content? Ok so Justin Timberlake’s video is considered “art” by some. Riiiiiight. BORING would be a more appropriate description.

How many times have you ever seen a music video of naked men dancing? It would look ridiculous. Degrading to men perhaps? Then there are those who respond by saying, “those women chose to do those videos”, or chose to model those clothes. It’s their choice. Does that make it OK?

The blurred line is when women objectify themselves as an expression of their empowerment over men. Does this help or harm the cause? Here are some images of how women have recently been portrayed in media and advertising.

Thank God today for this – for reminding me that there are people out there who are with me.


and this:

 

 

Surprise surprise!  The paternity lawsuit against Justin Bieber has been dropped.

Mariah Yeater, 20, alleged that the Canadian pop star was the father of her child. TMZ reported that after a call from Beiber’s laywer, Howard Weitzman, threatening legal action,  her lawyers reportedly withdrew from the case.

“As we’ve said from the beginning, it’s sad that someone would fabricate such a malicious, defamatory and demonstrably false claim. We’ll continue to consider all of our options to protect Justin,” Bieber’s rep said.

A court date had been set for December 15th.  Bieber, 17, was even prepared to take a paternity test to prove he didn’t father Yeater’s three-month-old baby.

Poor Biebs!  He threw out the so-called rumours right away, tweeted out he knew he would be a target, “but I’m never going to be a victim.”

The crazed fan is apparently trying to pursue her claim out of court.  The strangest part of all of this – if this had really happened, she would have been charged with statutory rape as Biebs was only 16 at the time of the alleged incident.

Bieber’s girlfriend, Selena Gomez, told Ellen DeGeneres it’s been tough for the couple since the crazy rumors began.

“What a crazy last two weeks it’s been in the news,” Ellen said to Gomez, 19, in an interview on her talk show.  “To say the least,” Gomez replied, saying it’s “not easy” dealing with the rumours but she and Bieber have been dealing with it all.