Author

amw

Browsing

With the obesity epidemic rising in Canada, researchers are urging legislative action.

“Obesity is expected to surpass smoking as the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality,” Dr. Mark Eisenberg of Jewish General Hospital and his co-authors wrote in Tuesday’s issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Action could mean taxing junk food, banning trans fats, limiting the number of fast-food outlets near schools, regulating salt intake, setting standard portion sizes and nutritional labels.

“Legislative approaches, together with environmental modifications, can be an effective means of reversing the growing problem of obesity in Canada,” the authors say.

Canadians have become heavier and less fit over the last three decades. People aged 20 to 39 years have a body mass index equivalent to what people aged 40 and older had 30 years ago.

“The growing problem of obesity in Canada can be reversed only with an integrated approach involving both the public health and medical models,” the authors conclude.

Americans will spend approximately $14.6 billion this year on gifts for Mother’s Day, according to the National Retail Federation. Despite this celebration of motherhood, hundreds of thousands of women worldwide die during pregnancy and childbirth — 1 out of 5 moms die in the United States. The US ranks 50th in terms of maternal health care, meaning that 49 other countries provide better care.

Did you know?

• One maternal death every 90 seconds.

• 15% of all pregnancies result in complications during labor and delivery and sometimes are fatal.

• Pregnancy is the biggest killer of girls ages 15-19.

• For every woman who dies in childbirth, 20 more suffer from debilitating complications.

• We have the knowledge to prevent 90% of all maternal deaths.

Moms4Moms asks:   what if 1% of that $14.6 billion could be given to this cause? Leveraging the power of social media, the group plans to raise awareness and funds for the organization Every Mother Counts.

Mom4Moms and mom and supermodel Christy Turlington’s Every Mother Counts are joining together to help this Mother’s Day. 

How can YOU help?  Visit “Moms4MomsDay”  which focuses on two initiatives: micro-donating, which encourages everyone to give as little as $5, and old cell-phone donation through the group Hope Phones, which refurbishes old phones and donates the proceeds.

Moms4Moms, a movement started by Holly Pavlika, hopes to “really make Mother’s Day about moms” by promoting the allocation of at least some of the money spent on gifts to mothers in need.”  Every Mother Counts is an advocacy and mobilization campaign to increase education and support for maternal and child health.

MTV reality shows 16 and Pregnant and Teen Mom chronicle teenage motherhood and show the struggles teenagers go through to raise their children.

But when shows like these become extremely popular, one can’t help but be concerned that that some teens would want to get pregnant just to appear on the show.

Now, Josh Smith, 16 and Pregnant reality “star” Josh Smith says the mother of his child, Jennifer Del Rio, plotted to get pregnant just so she could be on the MTV reality show, according to court documents.

In the court documents, Smith claims his baby mama is a “compulsive liar” who came up with a scheme to get pregnant. Del Rio allegedly told Smith she was pregnant, although she wasn’t, planning to conceive a child with him.

“She was giving me sonogram pictures … that she claimed was ‘our baby’ when in actually [sic] it was her friend’s sonogram pictures she was copying. She lied to me and my parents for 3 months saying she was pregnant. She wanted so desperately to be on 16 and Pregnant.”

The teenagers are in court after Smith filed a request for a restraining order against Del Rio, accusing her of punching him in the face.

What do you these of these teen pregnancy reality series airing on television?

Are the shows glamorizing teen pregnancy, causing some teenagers to get pregnant just to get on the show?  Or they simply depicting the real challenges young mom/moms-to-be face?

Who is invited to the Royal Wedding?

The royal palace has revealed a “selected” list of royals and celebrities who are confirmed to be wedding guests at the nuptials of Prince William and Kate Middleton on April 29th at Westminster Abbey.

David and Victoria Beckham and invited to attend.   Sir Elton John, who sang the hit Candle in the Wind at Diana’s funeral, will be accompanied by his Canadian partner David Furnish.

Also invited to the elite list:  singer Joss Stone,  director Guy Ritchie, Olympic swimmer Ian Thorpe and “Mr. Bean” star Rowan Atkinson, are all confirmed to attend.

Others who will be attending:  Peruvian-born Mario Testino, the photographer who took William and Kate’s official engagement photos, will be a guest along with the chief executive of BAFTA, known as the British Oscars.  Prince William became the president of BAFTA last year.

Hilary and Galen Weston will also be attending.  Hilary Weston was the lieutenant-governor of Ontario from 1997 to 2002. Her husband Galen is the chairman and president of George Weston Ltd., and No. 133 on this year’s list of Forbes magazine’s top billionaires.  He is also reportedly a close friend of Prince Charles.

Other royals?  Prince Albert of Monaco will attend with his fiance, Olympic swimmer Charlene Wittstock who are to be married this July.  Prince Elizabeth of Yugoslavia (second cousin to Prince Charles, mother of actress Catherine Oxenberg and 1397th in line to the British throne) will be a guest, as will royals from Spain, Greece, Tonga, Swaziland, Denmark, Bahrain, Belgium, Morocco, Norway, Abu Dhabi, The Netherlands, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia, among others.

Guests have been asked to come empty-handed: The couple requests donations to charities in lieu of wedding gifts.

Your Mother,

Who art the queen of the house

Hallowed be our name of mom and mommy too

You call us the best mom in the world

Because we clean and cook for you,

And wipe your butts, noses and smell your farts

Give us this day our daily coffee and chocolate

And forgive us our yelling and mom guilt

As we have forgiven you kids for your tantrums, whining and running our lives

And lead us not to the bottle of vodka or cabernet,

But deliver us chicken and pizza.

Amen.

In the past few weeks, we’ve been inundated with rumors or speculation about celebrities being pregnant.

First it was Nicole Richie, then Carrie Underwood and Scarlett Johansson.  Any hint of a baby bump and the pregnancy rumors start flying.

Shouldn’t we give these celebs a break?  Maybe they had a big lunch!  Maybe they are retaining water… hell, maybe they’re on their period for God’s sake!

Often, a celeb is simply photographed at the wrong angle. Or like Scarlett Johansson or Nicole Richie, as they were caught in their workout clothes, where the movement can show too much.  Heck, even a gust of wind can make a shirt bulge out!

Carrie Underwood said, “when I wear something a little baggier, I’m like, nope, people are going to think I’m hiding something.”

Scarlett Johansson, Carrie Underwood, Nicole Richie

A celebrity could be followed and photographed for 20 minutes but somehow, there is ONE photo that shows a celeb as a normal, human being.

Spotted out for a run with Owen Wilson and new beau Sean Penn recently, Scarlett Johansson showed just a hint of a belly, leading to some online rumors about a baby bump. A HINT of a belly.

A little belly and automatically someone is pregnant?  Geez, if THEY look pregnant, then what the heck does the average woman look like???

Why do we do this to women especially?  You hardly see articles about male actors putting on some weight.

When we turn every few pounds gained or lost by a celebrity into a story, it really does do damage that can be attached to issues of body image.

When I started reading “Parents, don’t dress your girls like tramps” written by CNN writer LZ Granderson, I was intrigued.  He published a piece following the recent controversy surrounding Abercrombie’s push up bikini for girls.

Now I understand Granderson’s point of view.  If girls are trying to dress like women, or too provocatively for their age, it is a huge cause for concern.  Companies like Abercrombie and Bratz creating products for girls too young to even start thinking about wearing a bra, is not helping.  And parents have a responsibility to teach their kids what is appropriate and what is not.

But the title itself, using the word “tramp”, didn’t sit well with me to being with.  Let’s not call any girl a tramp.  Also, the way in which he starts his piece, which was likely his intention, Granderson ends up sexualizing this girl himself.

“Her beautiful, long blond hair was braided back a la Bo Derek in the movie “10” (or for the younger set, Christina Aguilera during her “Xtina” phase). Her lips were pink and shiny from the gloss, and her earrings dangled playfully from her lobes.

You can tell she had been vacationing somewhere warm, because you could see her deep tan around her midriff thanks to the halter top and the tight sweatpants that rested just a little low on her waist. The icing on the cake? The word “Juicy” was written on her backside.

Yeah, that 8-year-old girl was something to see all right. … I hope her parents are proud. Their daughter was the sexiest girl in the terminal, and she’s not even in middle school yet.”

Such an elaborate description…was that his point?  That it’s easy for young girls to be viewed as “sexy”?

Or maybe it’s Granderson who is being inappropriate in his perception?  This could have been his intention – to invoke an uncomfortable feeling – that young girls dressing much older for their age cause others to perceive them in an inappropriate way.

Bottom line, we as parents should be mindful of how our children are dressed and the message they send.  It’s our responsibility as parents to protect our kids and ensure that they grow up with a positive self-esteem and body image.  We need to teach our daughters to respect themselves and dress appropriately.

What do you think?

by Christine LaRocque

I’m a working mom. I’m out of the home and away from my children 10 hours a day, five days a week. Consequently, I write a lot about the challenges of being away from my children and my quest to manage it all and manage it well. It’s who I am, what I do.

The expectations I have of myself can be overwhelming. Yet, this is the life I choose, the life I know I am meant to be living.

For all of that, I know there is a better way. I know I’m only doing an average job of carrying it all off. And I also know that the pressure I put on myself is self-inflicted and largely unnecessary. That’s why I’m working on changing, on adapting and becoming someone who is more comfortable in her own skin, someone who has better balance.

So you can understand why my interest was piqued by an article published a few months ago in the The Globe and Mail by Judith Timson: Work-life balance? Can that cliché.

Always on the lookout for answers, I read it immediately. You see, while I have a strong desire to find better balance, there are days when I think it would be easier to just capitulate to chaos.

I’ll admit I was a bit put-off when I read Timson’s description that balance is a bore. My initial response was that she just doesn’t get it. I wondered briefly if maybe she has too much balance. But as I read on, and discovered that what she really meant was that the time crunch we all experience as mothers is actually a life stage and not a way of life, I became more interested.

She writes:

There are simply periods of our lives when the burdens will be intense and, especially for parents of young children, we’re going to have to demonstrate by doing it that we can be both excellent workers and excellent parents.

 Burdens. Intense. Yes, I get that. I’m living it now. Everyday.

She goes on to argue:

But work-life balance itself has become a cliché, an all-purpose catchphrase, and a way of avoiding personal responsibility for making healthy choices.

This is where I beg to differ.

By definition, a cliché is a saying, expression, or, in this case, an idea that has been overused to the point that it loses its original meaning or effect. Balance has been a buzz word for many years. Arguably it is so because it’s so elusive. We live busy, programmed lives, in some cases by choice, but sometimes by necessity. Arguing that it’s simply a case of “avoiding personal responsibility for making healthy choices” simplifies the issue to the point of absurd. From my perspective, the need to find balance has become more important and harder than ever, not less so, cliché or not.

Sometimes how we live our lives is more complicated than simply being able to make “healthy choices” to change it.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not negating that there is some importance in what she says. I only find fault with the logic of the presumed simplicity. Our lives are busy. Many of us have full-time jobs and then come home to our second full-time job. Our days starts at the crack of dawn, and then race to the finish. We work endlessly to meet our responsibilities. We have to. There are bills to pay, we are trying to raise happy, well-adjusted children. We have to be available to support and help friends and family. Our responsibilities go on and on.

Are these choices? At their root I suppose they are, but once chosen, the choices become infinitely less available. We simply have to measure up.

So here is where I offer my own interpretation of balance. In reality, I don’t think it’s an all or nothing, a choice of one thing over another. I think it’s all about moderation. Focusing on what needs to be done, doing it when it needs to, but allowing responsibility to slip when you need, so that you can regain your equilibrium.

The counter-balance is different for everyone. For me it’s about a few hours to read or write, or coffee with a friend. It’s getting up from my desk at work and having a leisurely chat with a co-worker. It’s about a few moments sitting on my front porch chatting with my husband. Yes I’m making choices. Some are healthy, some maybe not, and all in moderation, because sometimes I simply can’t do everything. Sometimes duty calls and calls and calls.

It’s about not losing yourself completely in all the have to dos, and not giving in entirely to what you want to dos.

So is balance elusive? I don’t think so. Is it a cliché? Perhaps. Is it worth pursuing, absolutely!

How do you find balance?

 

 

Christine LaRocque, coffeescommutesChristine LaRocque is a full-time communications professional, wife, and mother to two under 5. While trying to manage a hectic lifestyle filled with long commutes and two unruly boys, she discovered that sometimes when you are trying to do everything, you are really doing nothing at all.

If you could have your children tested to see what kind of health issues they might face later in life, would you?  If given the chance, many parents would, according to new research.

But would they be accurate enough to tell if their kids would be genetically predisposed to diseases like diabetes or heart disease?

“These tests usually don’t offer a clean bill of health and can be hard to interpret even in the best scenario,” said Dr. Kenneth Tercyak of Georgetown University Medical Center, whose study was published in the journal Pediatrics.

Researchers surveyed 219 parents who were offered a genetic test that looked for eight common health conditions including colon, skin and lung cancers; heart disease; high cholesterol and type 2 diabetes.

Parents answered questions about the risks and benefits of testing for their children and whether they were interested in having their child tested. Although there was no proof that testing has any use, parents were still interested in having their child tested – especially those who thought their child’s test result would be positive.

What if the test has a negative result?  This would cause needless panic and devastation for a family.

How accurate are these tests?  Direct-to-consumer genetic tests have already raised concerns.  Several companies sell tests online and are unlike genetic tests ordered by doctors, which is why regulators worry that parents may not understand the limitations of the tests.

Organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics have advised against genetic testing.

Would you really want to know if your healthy child is carrying a genetic predisposition for a serious illness?

Just the other day, ABC announced it is ending two long-running soap operas, “All My Children” and “One Life to Live”.

At the same time, Oprah Winfrey and Regis Philbin are gearing up to leave daytime television this year.

“All My Children,” airing since 1970, and “One Life to Live,” on air since 1968, launched the careers of some of today’s biggest stars, including Sarah Michelle Gellar, Michelle Trachtenberg, Melissa Leo, Josh Duhamel, Eva LaRue, Christian Slater, Rosie O’Donnell, Kim Delaney and Amanda Seyfried.

It was the beginning of the end in 2009 when “The Guiding Light”, the longest running soap area (57 years), was cancelled.  “As the World Turns”, on air for 54 years, shortly followed.

Once a source of major entertainment for tens of millions of women, the soap opera genre is quickly fading.  Daytime TV has taken a backseat to cable TV networks, lifestyle programs and the internet. Television drama has been replaced by reality shows, GTL and the Kardashians.

ABC is replacing AMC and OLTL with lower-cost lifestyle shows.

Really? Do we really need more lifestyle shows?  Do we need more reality TV?

I’ve been a fan of The Young and the Restless and Days of Our Lives for years. Victor Newman has been living part-time in my living room since I can remember.  My crush for Nick Newman has sadly faded over the years, but my heart grows fondly of Cane and Billy.  I’m still amazed that Bo and Hope are still going strong. I grew alongside Sammi. And I drool over E.J.

These characters have been part of my daily life (on and off) for years! The storylines, although many crazy, have also taught me a thing or two…  Soaps have dealt with topical issues such as abortion, HIV, teen pregnancy, infidelity, illness and death. 

But the most important thing soaps have done is create a wonderful escape for millions of women!  That much-needed escape, getting caught in someone else’s “life” even temporarily, is what will be missed the most.

What do you think is happening to daytime and primetime drama?